Comparison of String and StringBuilder in C#

String vs. StringBuilder in C#

A string (from the System.String namespace) represents a sequence of Unicode characters used to store text. It's important to note that a String object is immutable, meaning once created, its value cannot be changed. It consists of a sequential collection of System.Char objects that represent the characters in the string. The maximum size of a String object in memory is 2 GB, which is roughly equivalent to 1 billion characters.

While a string is technically a reference type, it behaves differently when it comes to equality comparisons. The equality operators (== and !=) are designed to compare the values of string objects, not their references. However, an interesting behavior occurs after boxing, where the comparison happens on string instances.

string a = "prakash";
string b = "p";
b += "rakash"; // Appending to the contents of 'b'
Console.WriteLine(a == b); // Outputs: True
Console.WriteLine((object)a == (object)b); // Outputs: False

In contrast, a StringBuilder (found in System.Text.StringBuilder) represents a mutable string of characters. Unlike strings, StringBuilder instances can be modified after creation, making them suitable for scenarios where you need to build or manipulate strings dynamically.

By default, a StringBuilder object starts with a capacity of 16 characters, but it can grow to accommodate more than 2 billion characters if needed.

StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
Console.WriteLine(sb.ToString()); // Outputs: PrakashTripathi

How StringBuilder Works?

When you perform string concatenation using the + operator with string objects, the compiler creates a new string object to hold the concatenated result. This new object contains the characters from the original strings plus the newly added data. The new object is then assigned to the variable, effectively replacing the original string.

For instance, when concatenating two strings, the compiler allocates a new string with a length equal to the sum of the lengths of the input strings and copies the characters accordingly. This process repeats for each concatenation.

This copying behavior leads to multiple re-copying of strings, especially when concatenating multiple strings in a sequence. For N string concatenations (e.g.,result = str1 + str2 + str3 + ... + strN;), it results in N-1 allocations and N-1 copy operations, which can be inefficient for a large N.

On the other hand, a StringBuilder object maintains a buffer to accommodate the concatenation of new data. New data is appended to the buffer if room is available; otherwise, a new, larger buffer is allocated, data from the original buffer is copied to the new buffer, and the new data is appended to the new buffer. This approach is more efficient for large concatenations.

When to Use String and StringBuilder

Here are some guidelines on when to use strings and when to use StringBuilder.

  • String: Use string when you have a fixed number of concatenations, especially when concatenating string literals. The compiler can optimize these scenarios, resulting in efficient code.
  • StringBuilder: Use StringBuilder when you are concatenating an arbitrary number of strings, such as in a loop or when the number of concatenations is not known in advance. StringBuilder is more efficient for such dynamic concatenation scenarios.

Please note that the choice between string and StringBuilder can significantly impact performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Always consider the specific requirements of your code when making this decision.

Performance Comparison of String and StringBuilder

We conducted a performance comparison between string and StringBuilder in a large loop (100,000 iterations) and found the following results.

int dt1 = DateTime.Now.Millisecond;

string x = "";
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
    x += "!";
int dt2 = DateTime.Now.Millisecond;
Console.WriteLine("Time taken in string concatenation: " + (dt2 - dt1) + " MS");

int dt3 = DateTime.Now.Millisecond;
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
x = builder.ToString();
int dt4 = DateTime.Now.Millisecond;
Console.WriteLine("Time taken in StringBuilder concatenation: " + (dt4 - dt3) + " MS");



Keep in mind that the actual performance results may vary depending on your machine's configuration, but the general trend remains the same: StringBuilder is more efficient for dynamic concatenation tasks.

Some Tips

If you decide to use StringBuilder, consider specifying an initial size to the constructor to avoid frequent buffer size doubling. Additionally, if you have an array of strings to concatenate, you can use String.Concat or String.Join for efficiency.

Recommended Free Ebook
Similar Articles