I have observed various posts, discussions and mentalities about life at
Multinational Corporations (MNCs) and Small Companies (SCs). Some feel that MNCs
are best, some say that Small Companies are the best. These
Conflicting thoughts will mislead new comers. I would like to show some
light from my own experience of 6 years in small companies and 6 years in MNCs.
Believe me, I intend to say the truth as per my experience.
What is MNC?
Multinational Corporations are companies with a brand value and with locations
in many countries. For example Infosys, CTS, TCS, HP etcetera. The brand value
gives them an advantage in attracting talents and customers.
In short, most of the MNCs were small companies at one time that gained
experience and grew to a huge size.
Advantages of MNC
The following are advantages of MNCs that I have observed:
|Higher Salary ||On average, MNCs pay higher salaries than the small companies. SCs are struggling to pay competing salaries of MNCs. Exceptionally, I have seen a SC where the MD sells his LIC amount and pays a high salary to employees. Surely this is not the way to compete with MNC on salary. |
|Salary on Time ||Whatever is the case, you will get the payment received SMS on the first of every month or 2 days before that. In the case of small companies, the date may vary to up to the fifth of the month and might receive in installments throughout the month. |
|Brand Recognition ||MNCs have a Brand Value associated with them. It is really proud to say that you are from Infosys, Cognizant etcetera. It is a hidden truth that some of the SC employees experience a bit of an Inferiority Complex in front of MNC employees. the whenever I see such people I would say "MNC is not birth opportunity", you can work hard and attain it! |
|High Quality Working Standards ||MNCs tend to have top players like DJ and Karthikeyan. So you can expect high quality coding standards. You can expect the solid guru's around and strong methodologies for providing deployment, maintenance etcetera. In the case of small companies, these are less professional areas. |
|Better Choice and Growth ||Working in MNCs, I had more exposures to the Certifications and MVP arena. There I met passionate people who made me grow breadth and width wise in technology and standards. In the case of SCs, I would say they are mostly amateur and provide fewer chances to grow. Most of the SC clients are thin pocketed and they do not expect high quality and long term advantages. |
|Value for Career ||You can ask your small company itself. You have a MNC guy with 5 years experience and a small company guy with 5 years experience. Whom will you take? The boss will obviously take the MNC guy since he is also eager about growth, he gives an MNC exposure guy more value. (But to you he will say small companies are good, to retain you, business yaar.) |
|Trust Factor ||In the case of an experience certificate of the SC, the Trust Factor is very low. People can immediately create a new company web site, buy a mobile phone and add NAKLI experience. So an MNC guy will be more trustworthy in the market. Usually MNCs prefer MNC experienced candidates due to the reduced overhead of background checks and the quality of experience. (From a small company you have only 1/5 th chance to get into a MNC, but from a MNC you have 4/5 chance to get into a SC.) |
|Stop Loss Factor ||The Stop Loss (a trading term) factor plays a role during recessions. Imagine an MNC guy and a Small Company guy that have lost their job, both have the same potential and experience. The MNC guy can easily get an advantage from the immediate low level company. There are more people to catch the MNC guy. So more job security on Job Loss too for the MNC guy. |
|Marriage Market ||This point is a little weird, but It is a 100% true that the Ladki waala will prefer the MNC guy over the SC guy. This is because they wanted to see their daughter is secured in alliance to an Infosys guy, Wipro guy instead of the XYZ company in the ZYX street. I know many of my friends, who played around in SC companies and switched to MNC during their marriage times. Their parents pressured them for the change. There are dowry advantages too, but I am against dowry. For each problem, in the other side there could be an advantage! If you think from the girl in MNC, she will be valued high in the market and this reduces the dowry burden. |
|Credibility Market ||Do you know that the MNC guy and SC guy are treated differently in the loan market? There are various scales for MNC, Medium and Small companies. The loan approval and loan interest amount varies from 7% to 13% for the scale. You can check with a personal loan company. Some of my MNC friends take 7% loan and place in the bond market and enjoy the difference in interest as profit. |
|On-site Opportunities ||The chance of getting on-site opportunities are very high with MNCs. Most of their clients will be from United States, UK, Europe etcetera. The advantages of onsite are obviously money, visiting new countries and in most cases a pleasant experience. Usually the on-site opportunities may vary from 3 months to 3 years. A 6 month on-site assignment can fetch you the Principal Amount for buying a Flat! In the case of Small Companies, the on-site assignments are SIRF-NAAM-KE, the average on-site will be no on-site or 15 days. |
|Training & Certifications ||If you intend to grow in a particular technology and attaining certifications, MNCs support you more with Internal Training and Providing Reimbursements of certification exams. Certifications and Specializations add value for the company in front of their clients and they encourage it. In the case of a SC, they keep an eagle eye on the employee if he gets certification. Unless he/she is a core employee to their heart, they treat the Empowerment Movement as the potential loss of the employee. |
|Travel, Food and Perks ||The "Perks" of MNCs will be an Employee Cab, Bus and other commuting facilities at a reduced cost or no-cost. Plus the availability of good food and refreshments within the campus are specialties of MNCs. Everything is relative. In the case of a SC, I remember parking my bike in the narrow edge of a canal and arguing with the security guard. |
|Happier People ||Observing MNCs with SCs, I have seen people in MNCs are happier and more confident. Most of them have a feeling of self-actualization and guts to overcome problems. I admit that some of MNC people think they achieved the top of their career in life and have become lazy. |
|Employee Stock Options ||Free Stock Option is one Future Financial Advantage offered by MNCs. This makes the employees positively motivated to work more since the future gains are exponential like a few thousand valued stocks can become cores. This is seen less with SCs. |
|Flexibility of saying No ||In the case of MNCs we often deal with managers, clients and colleagues. If there is a difference opinion then we can say No and switch to another project in the same company and survive. But in the case of a SC, we often deal with the Company Owner and thus we have less opportunity for a different scenario. |
Advantages of Small Companies
If you protest my support of MNCs, please wait!! I wanted to say the good things
about small companies.
The primary point I would say is end-to-end work experience. Usually in the
small companies, we will be involved in nearly all activities like:
- Discussions with the client
- Requirements Gathering
- Creating new project in Visual Studio
- Database Design
- Deployment to Server
- Support & Maintenance
This will definitely add value for you for the first few years.
Again, I said only a few years, not
for your entire lifetime. If you are a growth minded person, then you will get
quite bored with the repeated end-to-end activities after a few years.
Exceptionally, some SCs have High Quality techies who were once MNC employees.
Their presence could fetch some good amount of values to the SC employees.
Comparison of work in MNCs
I have worked in MNCs where we needed to do all these activities from
end-to-end. Plus other MNCs where there is a specific Job
- Business Analysts that capture Client Requirements
- Database Designer that creates a database
- UI developer that creates the front end
- Backend developer the creates the backend wrapping code & services
- Tester that tests the product
- Deployment team that does the deployment >
- Support team that works with the customer problems
This makes one thing that the SC employee is mightier than
the MNC employee! Obviously this dialogue comes from your SC boss or manager. I
had a different thought here.
First of all, the MNC Job Design focuses on increasing efficiency, aligning
talents to technology and reducing employee turnover. Not all software engineers
are experts in UI and Database. They might have different aspirations like one
guy likes UI, the other guy likes database. In this way they can concentrate on
their respective arena and probably do certifications and blog to build power
over their core area.
So concentration on Core Technology is possible with MNCs. (Again, there is no
guarantee that all MNC supports the same, but I can assure you that on average
more MNCs support this than SCs.)
This is the reason we can see Database Administrator specialists, .Net
specialists and Java specialists in larger companies. Plus MNCs can provide more
exposure for these guys in different projects. Thus their core skills remain
activated and explored.
Concentration is important: I can give my
example from 2006, where I worked with Java, .Net, Delphi, PHP, HTML,
Trades and King of Nothing. All the noteriety went to specific Technology Gods
and I was undervalued compared to nearly half of them. (Interestingly, my pay
was set using the lowest skill level, HTML :).)
So I suggest you concentrate on a specific
technology depending on your passion. Concentration increases your
value in the market plus more enjoyment at work up to a saturation level.
Standards and Methodologies
Obviously MNCs have better standards and methodologies. This is one of the
reasons the MNC experience guy is given more weight age even in small companies.
For example, when i was a Delphi Programmer in year 2002 with a SC, I was using
plain vanilla kind of development. It was something like writing SQL statements
within the Windows Form events. I was not exposed to the Object Oriented way of
development since my boss and Team Leads around were grown up in the same small
company; they did not know the outside high quality standards and thus we were
not able to gain a solid value in the market, even after years of experience.
But, working with good MNCs I gained a solid exposure to Object Oriented
Programming, Design Patterns, Scrum, TDD, Agile Methodology, Continuous
Integration etcetera. I can blindly say that a mere 2 year experience in such
MNC is equivalent to the 10 year experience in a SC. (Exception: things will be
the opposite if you land up in a support project in MNC.)
Myths about MNCs
While I was in small companies, I used to hear the following.
roblems with MNC
- In MNCs we must work 12 hours: This istrue and false in MNC and SC. I had worked 12 hours, Saturday and Sunday too fora 20 employee SC, plus in a MNC too. Itdepends on the project situation and the greedy manager you get. In realitywherever people are working for 12 hours, in the long run, they produce only 6hours of productivity. There will be bugs and improper decisions that willdeplete the extra effort low-quality hours spent.
My strategy as a manager was tofocus 60% on development work and 40% on training and mentoring team members,plus identifying reusable components. This strategy reduced future developmenttime through reuse of components and a happier, satisfied team.
- In a MNC, there is no value for family life: Thisis again a true and false statement. This can happen both with SC and MNC. Ifyou encounter such a problem in any company, then you can quit the job for abetter work-life balanced job. Chances are better that you will get a better jobif you quit the MNC!
- In a MNC, there is a lot of politics: Thisis also true and false. In my career of 6 years with a SC and 6 years with aMNC, I saw cheap politics in both companies. There were spies who wanted todominate others or gain an extra penny from management, they used to betray us;they exist in both SC and MNC. But the good news with a MNC is that "even thecheap guys will have a minimum standard". :)
- In a MNC, A job is secured: This ispartially false. The MNCs are answerable to the investors. During recessions,employees with more bench times are terminated to cut cost. During those times,the so called sleeping-employees will feel the heat and start learning newtechnologies to allocate themselves in projects. But MNCs provide higher JobSecurity since the employee can find a new project within the company itself, inthe case of the SC the employee will need to leave the company and search in theopen job market. MNCs are certainly larger ships! The MNCs have highlyexperienced and strategic Financial Officers and Economy Predictors tostrategically position themselves during tough times. This is the core reasonthat even after multiple recessions the MNCs remain, but small companies bailout.
- In a MNC, there is no growth: A SeniorTCS friend of mine said this to me. In MNCs, they make sure you are not growing!When I closely examined the matter, the so-called sufferings occured due tosupport projects where learning opportunity is reduced. Usually, these projectsare handled by less aggressive Software Engineers who are unwilling to learn. Iwould say things are again in the engineer's hand, they can use their spare timein learning and getting certifications, update their internal resume with newskills, then request their manager to change their project, get interviewed foranother client and change. Nobody can stop you from progressing.
Since our friends indicated, the Bad
Back Reference Kick out would be a big problem with MNC. So in order to get in,
you need to have a clear past company, at least the immediate past one. The MNCs
check for your past employer existence, your salary, your behavior. As I said
already, they "Validate an employee from a non-validated source". What is the
proof that your past employer is a truthfu? To get through such problems, people
used to purchase employment histories and references from other small companies.
A proper solution I have is to work for another small company, gain 6 month
experience and apply to a MNC, here the immediate past company is a clear one
and thus the problem is solved. (Checking the previous 10 year character of a
person is of no use, the person might have changed in present :), so the
immediate past is important)
appreciate Shivanand's input "Nurturing a Laziness Culture in MNC". The
MNCs have Bench time and many support projects, that provide very less
opportunity for learning. In most cases the engineer ends up with a rusted set
of neurons. It is true but depends on the person as well. I have seen people who
feel secure enough in a MNC that spend their bench time on other non-career
deviation of thought would be: "The MNC did not force anybody to sit idle, the
employee has a choice to use his free time" Very fewer people (< 5%)
who are motivated about their career use their bench time in blogging, learning
and contributing towards forums or at least moving up in life. According to
them, the bench time provides ample opportunity for exercising their neurons and
growing. (Helping is growth if you play in an uncharted area.)
In my case, my 6 months was idle
waiting for VISA approval. I would say I utilized the time very well. I created
3 books in Design Patterns, Azure, SharePoint, wrote 200+ articles, gained 5000+
points over MSDN, gained a solid career in SharePoint, attained 3 MVP Awards as
the result of the whole. To me, the 6 months provided the value of 5 years of my
Providing the qualities of a good company, whether small/big I would add:
- Positive Work Environment
- Good Learning Opportunities
- Good Salary
- Promising Future
- Self Actualization Possibility
In short, if you are happy with your company whether SC or MNC, then continue
there. If you have strong aspirations in Career Growth then you should choose
your core technology area and focus on the paths ahead through MNCs.
Always see the source of advice. If
you are being advised by your SC boss, chances are greater that he will draw a
hectic picture about MNCs, because without you he is going to be troubled
ahead. You can ask your boss: If there
are more clients coming in then will you make this small company an MNC or not?
Obviously they also want to grow. :) For growth, they will also introduce MNC
standards into their small company.
Not all Small Companies are bad, not all MNCs are bad. But on average, MNCs are
better than Small Companies. (KFC chicken can have trouble once in a blue moon,
but food poison chances are higher in small hotels :))
MNCs are more financially secured
and career-rewarding compared with your SCs unless your SC boss has many
Most of the small companies have a
passion to grow high, otherwise there is a chance that they might fail in the
future due to big MNCs taking their chunk of the meat. So as a person seeking
growth, your small company is also seeking growth, chances are high that if it
succeeds, your small company can become an MNC.
you can do an MNC as part of a campus interview then that would be really great
since you can leave the SC problems behind. If you landed up in a small company,
then learning more and switching to a MNC would be a good idea.
In short, life is about service, the
more service we do the more our soul is satisfied. If your existing company
cannot provide a good platform for servicing or meritocracy fails then you
should find the next best platform to service better.
Ultimately, I would say we should practice our core passion of life. It is only
possible if we have Financial Freedom to do so. I would recommend, we should
convert every problem to opportunities to grow further and attain financial
freedom. At the point we can chase our passion or help back