Blue Theme Orange Theme Green Theme Red Theme
 
Click Here for 3 Month Free of ASP.NET Hosting!
Home | Forums | Videos | Photos | Downloads | Blogs | E-Books | Interviews | Jobs | Beginners | Training
 | Consulting  
Submit an Article Submit a Blog 
 Login Close
User Id:
Password:
 
Forgot Password
Forgot Username
Why Register
 Jump to
Skip Navigation Links
TechnologyExpand Technology
WebsiteExpand Website
 Resources  
Close
 Our Network  
Close
Search :       Advanced Search »
Home » .NET 3.0/3.5 » Focus on the Extension of WCF Behavior

Focus on the Extension of WCF Behavior

WCF provides the flexible and extensible architecture for the developer. The most common situation is to customize the extension of behavior. It is not complex, but some issues should be noticed. This article is prepare to discuss how to extend the behavior in WCF.

Technologies: .NET 3.0 and 3.5, Silverlight,Visual C# .NET
Total downloads :
Total page views :  1372
Rating :
 0/5
This article has been rated :  0 times
   Print Read/Post comments Post a comment  Rate  
   Email to a friend  Bookmark  Similar Articles  Author's other articles  
 
Become a Sponsor


Related EbooksTop Videos


WCF provides the flexible and extensible architecture for the developer. The most common situation is to customize the extension of behavior. It is not complex, but some issues should be noticed. This article is prepare to discuss how to extend the behavior in WCF.

On the service side, if we want to extend the behavior, we need to extend the DispatchRuntime and DispatchOperation. The points of extension include inspecting parameters, messages and invoker of operations. The corresponding interfaces are IParameterInspector (to inspect parameters), IDispatchMessageInspector(to inspect messages) and IOperationInvoker(to invoke the operation). On the client side, we should extend the ClientRuntime and ClientOperation, and the points of extension include inspecting parameters and messages. The corresponding interfaces are IParameterInspector and IClientMessageInspector. All interfaces are placed in System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher namespace. Note please that IParameterInspector can be applied both service side and client side.

It seems like implementation of AOP (Aspect Oriented Programming) to implement these interfaces. We can inject some additional logic before and after invoking the related methods, so we call these extensions "Listener". For example, There are some methods in IParameterInspector interface as below:

void AfterCall(string operationName, object[] outputs, object returnValue, object correlationState);

object BeforeCall(string operationName, object[] inputs);

BeforeCall() method will be invoked before we invoke the target method of the service object, and AfterCall() method will be occured after the target method is invoked. For instance, we can validate if the value of parameter is less than zero before the method is invoked. If yes, it will throw an exception:

public class CalculatorParameterInspector : IParameterInspector

{

    public void BeforeCall(string operationName, object[] inputs)

    {

        int x = inputs[0] as int;

        int y = inputs[1] as int;

        if (x < 0 || y < 0)

        {

            throw new FaultException("The number can not be less than zero.");

        }

        return null;

    }

    public void AfterCall(string operationName, object[] outputs, object returnValue, object correlationState)

    {

        //empty;

    }

}

It distinguishs between the service and client side to inspect the parameter, and the methods of interface are quite converse to the order of messaging(Note: IDispatchMessageInspector interface includes BeforeSendReply() and AfterReceiveRequest(); and IClientMessageInspector interface includes BeforeSendRequest() and AfterReceiveReply()). We might handle the message through by the methods of this interface, for example, printing the message header:

 

public class PrintMessageInterceptor : IDispatchMessageInspector

{

    #region IDispatchMessageInspector Members

    public object AfterReceiveRequest(ref System.ServiceModel.Channels.Message request, IClientChannel channel, InstanceContext instanceContext)

    {

        MessageBuffer buffer = request.CreateBufferedCopy(Int32.MaxValue);

        request = buffer.CreateMessage();

        Console.WriteLine("After Receive Request:");

        foreach (MessageHeader header in request.Headers)

        {

            Console.WriteLine(header);

        }

        Console.WriteLine(new string('*', 20));

        return null;

    }

    public void BeforeSendReply(ref System.ServiceModel.Channels.Message reply, object correlationState)

    {

        MessageBuffer buffer = reply.CreateBufferedCopy(Int32.MaxValue);

        reply = buffer.CreateMessage();

        Console.WriteLine("Before Send Request:");

        foreach (MessageHeader header in reply.Headers)

        {

            Console.WriteLine(header);

        }

        Console.WriteLine(new string('*', 20));

    }

    #endregion

}

There are four different kinds of behaviors including Service Behavior, Endpoint Behavior, Contract Behavior and Operation Behavior. Their corresponding interfaces are IServiceBehavior, IEndpointBehavior, IContractBehavior and IOperationBehavior. Although they are different interface by nature, but their methods are almost similar including: AddBindingParameters(), ApplyClientBehavior() and ApplyDispatchBehavior().

Note: Because IServiceBehavior is only used on the service side, so it has no ApplyClientBehavior() method.

We can customize our class to implement these interface, but some key elements should be underlined:

 

1. The scope of the behavior. Table 1 describes all situations:
 

Behavior Type

Interface

Scope

Service

Endpoint

Contract

Operation

Service

IServiceBehavior

Y

Y

Y

Y

Endpoint

IEndpointBehavior

 

Y

Y

Y

Contract

IContractBehavior

 

 

Y

Y

Operation

IOperationBehavior

 

 

 

Y


2. We can add the extension of service behavior, contract behavior and operation behavior by applying on custom attribute, but can not add the extension of endpoint behavior in this way.  We can add the extension of service behavior and endpoint behavior by using config file, but can not add the extension of contract behavior and operation behavior in this way. All behaviors can be added by ServiceDescription.

To add the extended behavior by applying on custom attribute, we can let the custom behavior derived from Attribute class. Then we can apply it on service, contract or operation:

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class|AttributeTargets.Interface)]

public class MyServiceBehavior:Attribute, IServiceBehavior

{}

[MyServiceBehavior]

public interface IService

{ }

If you want to add the extended behavior by using config file, you must define a class derived from BehaviorExtensionElement (It belongs to System.ServiceModel.Configuration namespace) class, then override the BehaviorType property and CreateBehavior() method. BehaviorType property returns the type of extended behavior, and CreateBehavior() is responsible for creating the instance of the extended behavior:
 

public class MyBehaviorExtensionElement : BehaviorExtensionElement

{

    public MyBehaviorExtensionElement() { }

    public override Type BehaviorType

    {

        get { return typeof(MyServiceBehavior); }

    }

    protected override object CreateBehavior()

    {

        return new MyServiceBehavior();

    }

}

If the element which should be configured add the new property, we must apply the ConfigurationPropertyAttribute on this new one:
 

[ConfigurationProperty("providerName", IsRequired = true)]

public virtual string ProviderName

{

    get

    {

        return this["ProviderName"] as string;

    }

    set

    {

        this["ProviderName"] = value;

    }

}

The detail of config file like this:
 

<configuration>

  <system.serviceModel>

    <services>

      <service name="MessageInspectorDemo.Calculator">

        <endpoint behaviorConfiguration="messageInspectorBehavior"

                  address="http://localhost:801/Calculator"

                  binding="basicHttpBinding"

                  contract="MessageInspectorDemo.ICalculator"/>

      </service>

    </services>

    <behaviors>

      <serviceBehaviors>

        <behavior name="messageInspectorBehavior">

          <myBehaviorExtensionElement providerName="Test"/>

        </behavior>

      </serviceBehaviors>

    </behaviors>

    <extensions>

      <behaviorExtensions>

        <add name="myBehaviorExtensionElement"

            type="MessageInspectorDemo.MyBehaviorExtensionElement,

            MessageInspectorDemo,

            Version=1.0.0.0,

            Culture=neutral,

            PublicKeyToken=null"/>

      </behaviorExtensions>

    </extensions>

  </system.serviceModel>

</configuration>

Please notes the contents which font are bold. <myBehaviorExtensionElement> is our extended behavior, and providerName is the new property of MyBehaviorExtensionElement. If you extended IEndpointBehavior, <serviceBehaviors> section should be replaced with <endpointBehaviors>. The extensions of custom behaviors will be placed in the <extensions></extensions> section. The value of name attribute must match the configuration of <behavior> section, both are "myBehaviorExtensionElement".

The value of type inside the <behaviorExtensions> section you want to add must be the full name of type. The first part of the full name is the full type name, and the second part of the name is the namespace. Version, Culture and PublicKeyToken are also indispensable elements. The string of type name use the comma as a splitter. After the comma, it must left a space, otherwise we can not add the configuration of extended behavior normally. Why does it give the awful constraint here? Because the value is prepared for reflect technology. I agree that it is a defect. I hope microsoft will solve this problem in the next release of WCF.

3. In the body of related methods, we need to add the extensions of checking parameters, messages and operation invoker. The relationship between the extension of them exists here. For checking parameters, the logic of extensions might be added in ApplyClientBehavior() and ApplyDispatchBehavior() of IOperationBehavior interface. For example, we can define a CalculatorParameterValidation class for CalculatorParameterInspector:
 

public class CalculatorParameterValidation : Attribute, IOperationBehavior

{

    #region IOperationBehavior Members

    public void AddBindingParameters(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)

    {

    }

    public void ApplyClientBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        ClientOperation clientOperation)

    {

        CalculatorParameterInspector inspector = new CalculatorParameterInspector();

        clientOperation.ParameterInspectors.Add(inspector);

    }

    public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        DispatchOperation dispatchOperation)

    {

        CalculatorParameterInspector inspector = new CalculatorParameterInspector();

        dispatchOperation.ParameterInspectors.Add(inspector);

    }

    public void Validate(OperationDescription operationDescription)

    {

    }

    #endregion

}

If it is not necessary to seperate the inspector from the extended behavior, a better solution is to let a custom class implement both IParameterInspector and IOperationBehavior. For example:
 

public class CalculatorParameterValidation : Attribute, IParameterInspector, IOperationBehavior

{

    #region IParameterInspector Members

    public void BeforeCall(string operationName, object[] inputs)

    {

        int x = inputs[0] as int;

        int y = inputs[1] as int;

        if (x < 0 || y < 0)

        {

            throw new FaultException("The number can not be less than zero.");

        }

        return null;

    }

    public void AfterCall(string operationName, object[] outputs, object returnValue, object correlationState)

    {

        //empty;

    }

    #endregion

    #region IOperationBehavior Members

    public void AddBindingParameters(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)

    {

    }

    public void ApplyClientBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        ClientOperation clientOperation)

    {

        CalculatorParameterInspector inspector = new CalculatorParameterInspector();

        clientOperation.ParameterInspectors.Add(this);

    }

    public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        DispatchOperation dispatchOperation)

    {

        CalculatorParameterInspector inspector = new CalculatorParameterInspector();

        dispatchOperation.ParameterInspectors.Add(this);

    }

    public void Validate(OperationDescription operationDescription)

    {

    }

    #endregion

}

While operation invoker is associated with IOperationBehavior, but in fact, it will do with Invoker property of DispatchOperation. Assume that we have defined a MyOperationInvoker class which implement the IOperationInvoker interface, the solution is:
 

public class MyOperationInvoker : IOperationInvoker

{

    //some implementation

}

public class MyOperationInvokerBehavior : Attribute, IOperationBehavior

{

    #region IOperationBehavior Members

    public void AddBindingParameters(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)

    {

    }

    public void ApplyClientBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        ClientOperation clientOperation)

    {

    }

    public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(OperationDescription operationDescription,

        DispatchOperation dispatchOperation)

    {

        dispatchOperation.Invoker = new MyOperationInvoker(dispatchOperation.Invoker);

    }

    public void Validate(OperationDescription operationDescription)

    {

    }

    #endregion

}

As far as message inspecting with Dispatch are concerned, we can add it using MessageInspectors property in DispatchRuntime owned by  IServiceBehavior, or IEndpointBehavior, or IContractBehavior. For message inspecting with Client, we can add in using MessageInspectors property in ClientRuntime owned by IEndpointBehavior or IContractBehavior(IServiceBehavior can not be used on the client side, so it's not IServiceBehavior's business). For example:
 

public class PrintMessageInspectorBehavior : IDispatchMessageInspector, IEndpointBehavior

{

    #region IEndpointBehavior Members

    public void AddBindingParameters(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, BindingParameterCollection bindingParameters)

    {

        //empty;

    }

    public void ApplyClientBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, ClientRuntime clientRuntime)

    {

        clientRuntime.MessageInspectors.Add(this);

    }

    public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(ServiceEndpoint endpoint, EndpointDispatcher endpointDispatcher)

    {

        endpointDispatcher.DispatchRuntime.MessageInspectors.Add(this);

    }

    public void Validate(ServiceEndpoint endpoint)

    {

        //empty;

    }

    #endregion

    //The implemenation of DispatchMessageInspector; Omitted

}

If our behavior implement the IServiceBehavior, we must iterate the ServiceHostBase object in the ApplyDispatchBehavior() method:
 

public void ApplyDispatchBehavior(ServiceDescription serviceDescription, ServiceHostBase serviceHostBase)

{

    foreach (ChannelDispatcher channelDispatcher in serviceHostBase.ChannelDispatchers)

    {

        foreach (EndpointDispatcher endpointDispatcher in channelDispatcher.Endpoints)

        {

            endpointDispatcher.DispatchRuntime.MessageInspectors.Add(this);

        }

    }

}


Login to add your contents and source code to this article
 [Top] Rate this article
 About the author
 
Bruce Zhang
I am a software engineer based on .NET platform, and a solutions architect for the enterprise application system. I am a Microsoft MVP for WCF, and also a techinical writter and blogger.Visit my blog:http://brucezhang.wordpress.com
Looking for C# Consulting?
C# Consulting is founded in 2002 by the founders of C# Corner. Unlike a traditional consulting company, our consultants are well-known experts in .NET and many of them are MVPs, authors, and trainers. We specialize in Microsoft .NET development and utilize Agile Development and Extreme Programming practices to provide fast pace quick turnaround results. Our software development model is a mix of Agile Development, traditional SDLC, and Waterfall models.
Click here to learn more about C# Consulting.
 
Introducing MaxV - one click. infinite control. Hyper-V Hosting from MaximumASP.
Finally – a virtual platform that delivers next-generation Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V virtualization technology from a managed hosting partner you can truly depend on. Visit www.maximumasp.com/max for a FREE 30 day trial. Hurry offer ends soon. Climb aboard the MaxV platform and take advantage of High Availability, Intelligent Monitoring, Recurrent Backups, and Scalability – with no hassle or hidden fees. As a managed hosting partner focused solely on Microsoft technologies since 2000, MaximumASP is uniquely qualified to provide the superior support that our business is built on. Unparalleled expertise with Microsoft technologies lead to working directly with Microsoft as first to offer IIS 7 and SQL 2008 betas in a hosted environment; partnering in the Go Live Program for Hyper-V; and product co-launches built on WS 2008 with Hyper-V technology.
Dynamic PDF
ceTE software specializes in components for dynamic PDF generation and manipulation. The DynamicPDF™ product line allows you to dynamically generate PDF documents, merge PDF documents and new content to existing PDF documents from within your applications.
Go.NET
Build custom interactive diagrams, network, workflow editors, flowcharts, or software design tools. Includes many predefined kinds of nodes, links, and basic shapes. Supports layers, scrolling, zooming, selection, drag-and-drop, clipboard, in-place editing, tooltips, grids, printing, overview window, palette. 100% implemented in C# as a managed .NET Control. Document/View/Tool architecture with many properties&events. Optional automatic layout.
Dundas Software
Dundas Chart for .NET is the most advanced .NET charting package available today.  With an extremely complete feature set, elegant architecture and easy implementation, Dundas Chart can quickly add advanced Charting functionality to enhance and transform ASP.NET and Windows Forms applications.  Whether you are implementing charting into internal projects, or building applications for clients, Dundas Chart offers advanced technology and advanced results to get the most out of data.
Clickatell's SMS Gateway
Clickatell's Developer Solutions allow you to SMS enable any website or application via a range of API's. Learn More about our API connections.
Free access to .NET Memory Management video
Everything you need to know about Garbage Collection, Temporary Objects, Fragmentation, Finalization and common causes of memory leaks in .NET. Watch the video here.
Microsoft Visual Studio 2010
Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 offers more to developers than any other Visual Studio release. Work more productively and collaboratively-with greater control over your work at every step. The Beta 2 can give you a head start on achieving efficiency.
 
   Print Read/Post comments Post a comment  Rate  
   Email to a friend  Bookmark  Similar Articles  Author's other articles  
 
 Post a Feedback, Comment, or Question about this article
Subject:  
Comment:  
Become a Sponsor
 Comments

 Hosted by MaximumASP  |  Found a broken link?  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Suggest an Idea  |  Media Kit
Current Version: 5.2009.6.2
 © 1999 - 2009  Mindcracker LLC. All Rights Reserved