Introduction

One of the most common questions teams ask when adopting Agile is:

Which framework should we use?

Scrum, Kanban, and SAFe are widely used frameworks, but they serve different purposes depending on team size, workflow structure, and organizational scale.

In this article, we will compare these frameworks and demonstrate a simple example showing how teams can manage work items using a basic Kanban-style workflow simulation.

Scrum

Scrum provides a structured Agile framework with defined roles, ceremonies, and artifacts.

Key components include:

Scrum works well for small cross-functional product teams.

Kanban

Kanban focuses on continuous flow of work rather than time-boxed iterations.

Key principles include:

Kanban is often used for operations or support teams.

SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework)

SAFe is designed for large organizations with multiple teams.

It introduces coordination mechanisms such as:

This helps align dozens of teams working on large enterprise systems.

Practical Example: Simple Kanban Workflow Simulation

Below is a simple program that simulates tasks moving through a workflow.

Example Code

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        List<string> todo = new List<string> {"Task A", "Task B"};
        List<string> inProgress = new List<string>();
        List<string> done = new List<string>();

        inProgress.Add(todo[0]);
        todo.RemoveAt(0);

        done.Add(inProgress[0]);
        inProgress.RemoveAt(0);

        Console.WriteLine("Tasks completed: " + done.Count);
    }
}

Step-by-Step Explanation

Step 1: Create three lists representing workflow stages.

Step 2: Move tasks from To Do to In Progress.

Step 3: Move tasks from In Progress to Done.

Step 4: Count completed tasks.

This simulates a basic Kanban workflow.

Output

Example output:

Tasks completed: 1

This indicates one task successfully moved through the workflow.

Conclusion

Selecting the right Agile framework depends on team size and project complexity.

Many organizations adopt hybrid approaches combining multiple frameworks.