Encounter with Java Guys!!!

Again, the Interpretation concept was there in Python language & our old computer science text books too.. So we cannot say anybody copied it. But everybody implemented it in the best of their ability for addressing customer problems.

Talking about Platform Independence, Java cannot attain Perfect Platform Independence. The same source code won't work in different systems like desktop, mobile, different operating system because the underlying presentation sub system, file system, event mechanisms are different. Till now thisplatform independence is achieved mostly by web application through HTTP & HTML adding power through client side scripts too. So Java cannot claim full platform independence as we have to change the code based on platforms. So i do not wanted to present .Net Mono for Linux against Java!

C# is better than Java

Regarding the quality aspects I would say C# is better than Java.. C# language 4.5 compared with Java 1.7 has following advantages:

1. Lambda Expressions
2. LINQ
3. Delegates
4. IDE Integrated Entity Framework

Additionally, all those things in Java are there in .Net too:

1. Annotations as Attributes
2. Reflection as Reflection
3. Generics as Generics
4. java.util as System.Collections
5. JVM as .Net Runtime
6. JUnit as NUnit, Visual Studio Unit Tests
7. Hibernate as NHibernate, Entity Framework
8. JSP as ASP.NET
9. J2ME as Windows Phone
10. Mobile, SWT/Applet as WinForms/WPF

Plus more than 18 languages supported in .Net

Friends, I am telling these as I have worked in Java for a short span of time.. I am assuring you that .Net is better than Java, but as a Java Programmer you need some time in learning the ropes – but first you have to LOVE .Net Platform.

Microsoft have lot of Technologies at Affordable Prices

I was wondering whether he is an ignorant to Microsoft Technologies while saying “Microsoft do not have much technologies”

I replied: Do you know that Microsoft is one of the top 3 technology providers with varieties like:

1. Desktop Operating Systems
2. Tablets & Mobile
3. Office suite like Word, Excel etc.
4. Programming Platforms like .Net
5. Languages – C#, VB.NET
6. Database as SQL Server & Access
7. Server side like SharePoint, BizTalk, Exchange etc.
8. Publishing with Visio, PowerPoint etc.
9. Gaming arena with XBOX
10. Bing Search Engine, Outlook, Azure etc.

Seems like there is no reply, but only WONDERMENT on the array of technologies..

But he defended this time by saying.. “Why they are not Free? Who will purchase them?”

This is a serious question and as I faced the same years back, I had thought about the answer.

Popularity

It is true that Java is more popular than C#, more developers are using it.. But it does not mean that it is the Mightier one!

There are only few BMWs on the road, do that means others are mightier?

If it was Free, then it won't exist

I replied, My dear friend, I wanted you to make an unbiased look on the following:

Java is free, but for core consultation there is a price by the company

Java is free, but you developers are not free..

Tell me one thing.. Are you ready to work for FREE? No.. Right? (you cannot pay your rent, utility bills if you work for free)

Talking from a Business Evaluator perspective, A mere Free Java is of no use. For creating applications, A business has to add computers, internet, hire developers, rent work space spend on development time, spend on maintenance costs. So the tool like Java / .Net is only a portion of the money in right cases a paid tool will be more effective in the long run in reducing costs & increasing quality. The effect will vary based on larger projects.

Additionally Java Developers are of higher cost than .Net guys. So in specific scenarios where Java Developer Rates are High, Java Development Costs are high, Java Resources are Rare, it adds higher costs to development using Java. So .Net would be a better choice in this case.

IF EVERYTHING IS FREE, THEN THERE IS ALMOST ZERO INNOVATIONS, ZERO ENTERTAINMENTS, ONLY GRASS & ROCK & TREES AND WE ARE LIKE MONKEYS!

Your company might save cost in choosing Java as the IDE & Language are free.. But they spend money in hiring developers & more money in developing efforts. So in the long run .Net is better than Java.. This is the reason why .Net is selling even though it is not Free!

I gently questioned him: So why you are blaming others for not selling their things for free?

It is the company strategy, to sell something for money or for free.

You can see that things were free and now Sun was acquired by Oracle. In the stock market terms, a company is ready to be sold only if they loose confidence in future profits.. So your Java & Sun was sold to Oracle.. They lost the competition. Now why you are fighting for Java.. Come on.. Forget the Past.. Welcome the future with SharePoint..

THE CLIMAX

Seems like the Mr. Manager is silent now.. no questions, no answers..

I thought of ending the session in that positive note.. meantime one of his team member RISED FROM THE GRAVE and SAID:

“PHP is better than .Net. PHP is light, it is fast, it is free.. What do you wanted to say about that?”

I was Shocked! I remembered a proverb suddenly, Escaped from a KING COBRA and bitten by a LIZARD.

(I just vanished from the scene )

Disclaimer

I wanted to say that this is not any Personal Vengeance against Java. But just an unbiased, 500 feet view of both the technologies. I feel all technologies are good based on the solution & availability of resources. But Still I recommend Microsoft Technologies as it is Cool, Affordable, Profitable in Long Run