This post details another
solution to a very basic problem that we face in our development and tend to
miss writing Stored Procedures. We know ExecuteNonQuery() function defined in
the SqlCommand class returns the number of rows affected by the query we are
executing. Sometimes, when calling a Stored Procedure using the
ExecuteNonquery() from .Net code returns a value of -1.
Let us consider this function
that tries inserting Email address and Password fields to the database via a
test SP.
Public Function TestInsert()
As Boolean
Dim conn As SqlConnection = Nothing
Dim cmd As SqlCommand = Nothing
Try
conn =
New SqlConnection(connectionString)
conn.Open()
If passport Is Nothing Then
cmd =
New SqlCommand("sp_Test_Insert",
conn)
End If
cmd.CommandType =
CommandType.StoredProcedure
cmd.Parameters.Add(New
SqlParameter("Email",
"email@email.com"))
cmd.Parameters.Add(New
SqlParameter("Password",
"password"))
Dim rows = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
If rows > -1 Then
Return True
Else
Return False
End If
Catch ex As Exception
Return False
Finally
If Not conn
Is Nothing Then
conn.Close()
End If
conn = Nothing
End Try
End Function
When you generate a Stored
Procedure in SSMS using the “New Stored Procedure” link, SQL generates a
template for you. Below is a modified version of the same being used in our code
above:
CREATE PROC sp_Test_Insert
@Email nvarchar(255),
@Password nvarchar(20)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
INSERT INTO Test_Table(Email, Password) VALUES(@Email, @Password)
END
The query looks fine and
after doing a bit of research, I found that the 1st line in the Stored procedure
is the culprit. From MSDN, placing SET NOCOUNT ON; in the query sets, prevent
extra result sets from SQL server interfering with SELECT statements.
To resolve, just remove this
line or change this line to SET NOCOUNT OFF; and everything works fine.