Best Practices No 5: Detecting .NET application memory leaks

Introduction

Memory leaks in a .NET application have always been a programmer's nightmare. Memory leaks are the worst problem in production servers. Production servers normally need to run with the least down time. Memory leaks grow slowly and after time they bring down the server by consuming huge chunks of memory. Most of the time people reboot the system, make it work temporarily and send a sorry note to the customer for the downtime.

Please feel free to download my free 500 question and answer eBook which covers .NET, ASP.NET, SQL Server, WCF, WPF and WWF @ http://www.questpond.com/.

1.jpg

Avoid task manager to detect memory leak

The first and foremost task is to confirm that there is a memory leak. Many developers use windows task manager to confirm, is there a memory leak in the application?. Using task manager is not only misleading but it also does not give much information about where the memory leak is.

 2.jpg
First let's try to understand how the task manager memory information is misleading. Task manager shows working set memory and not the actual memory used, ok so what does that mean. This memory is the allocated memory and not the used memory. Adding further some memory from the working set can be shared by other processes / applications.

3.jpg

So the working set memory can be larger than the actual memory used.

Using private bytes performance counters to detect memory leak

In order to correctly get the amount of memory consumed by the application we need to track the private bytes consumed by the application. Private bytes are those memory areas which are not shared by other application. In order to detect private bytes consumed by an application we need to use performance counters.

The steps we need to follow to track private bytes in an application using performance counters are:

  • Start you application which has memory leak and keep it running.

  • Click start and Goto run and type 'perfmon'.

  • Delete all the current performance counters by selecting the counter and deleting the same by hitting the delete button.

  • Right click and select 'Add counters' and  select 'process' from performance object.

  • From the counter list select 'Private bytes'.

  • From the instance list select the application which you want to test memory leak for.

If your application shows a steady increase in private bytes value that means we have a memory leak issue here. You can see in the below figure how private bytes value is increasing steadily thus confirming that application has a memory leak.

 4.jpg
 
The above graph shows a linear increase but in live implementation it can take hours to show the increase. In order to check memory leak you need to run the performance counter for hours or probably days together on production server to check if really there is a memory leak.

3 step process to investigate memory leak

Once we have confirmed that there is a memory leak, it's time to investigate the root problem of the memory leak. We will divide our journey to the solution in 3 phases what, how and where.

  • What: - We will first try to investigate what is the type of memory leak, is it a managed memory leak or an unmanaged memory leak.

  • How: - What is really causing the memory leak. Is it the connection object, some kind of file who handle is not closed etc?

  • Where: - Which function / routine or logic is causing the memory leak.

 5.jpg

What is the type of memory leak? Total Memory = Managed memory + unmanaged memory

Before we try to understand what the type of leak is, let's try to understand how memory is allocated in .Net applications. .NET applications have two types of memory managed memory and unmanaged memory. Managed memory is controlled by garbage collection while unmanaged memory is outside of garbage collectors boundary.

6.jpg
 
So the first thing we need to ensure what is the type of memory leak is it managed leak or unmanaged leak. In order to detect if it's a managed leak or unmanaged leak we need to measure two performance counters.

The first one is the private bytes counter for the application which we have already seen in the previous session.
The second counter which we need to add is 'Bytes in all heaps'. So select '.NET CLR memory' in the performance object, from the counter list select 'Bytes in all heaps' and the select the application which has the memory leak.

 7.jpg
Private bytes are the total memory consumed by the application. Bytes in all heaps are the memory consumed by the managed code. So the equation becomes something as shown in the figure below.

8.jpg

Unmanaged memory + Bytes in all helps = private bytes, so if we want to find out unmanaged memory we can always subtract the bytes in all heaps from the private bytes.

Now we will make two statements:

  • If the private bytes increase and bytes in all heaps remain constant that means it's an unmanaged memory leak.

  • If the bytes in all heaps increase linearly that means it's a managed memory leak.

Below is a typical screenshot of unmanaged leak. You can see private bytes are increasing while bytes in heaps remain constant

9.jpg

Below is a typical screen shot of a managed leak. Bytes in all heaps are increasing.

 10.jpg  

How is the memory leak happening?

Now that we have answered what type of memory is leaking it's time to see how is the memory leaking. In other words who is causing the memory leak ?.

So let's inject an unmanaged memory leak by calling 'Marshal.AllocHGlobal' function. This function allocates unmanaged memory and thus injecting unmanaged memory leak in the application. This command is run within the timer number of times to cause huge unmanaged leak.

  1. private void timerUnManaged_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)   
  2. {   
  3.     Marshal.AllocHGlobal(7000);   
  4. }  
It's very difficult to inject a managed leak as GC ensures that the memory is reclaimed. In order to keep things simple we simulate a managed memory leak by creating lot of brush objects and adding them to a list which is a class level variable. It's a simulation and not a managed leak. Once the application is closed this memory will be reclaimed.
  1. private void timerManaged_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)   
  2. {   
  3.     for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)   
  4.     {   
  5.         Brush obj = new SolidBrush(Color.Blue);   
  6.         objBrushes.Add(obj);   
  7.     }   
  8. }  
In case you are interested to know how leaks can happen in managed memory you can refer to weak handler for more information http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa970850.aspx  .


The next step is to download 'debugdiag' tool from http://www.microsoft.com/DOWNLOADS/details.aspx?FamilyID=28bd5941-c458-46f1-b24d-f60151d875a3&displaylang=en 
Start the debug diagnostic tool and select 'Memory and handle leak' and click next.

 11.jpg
 
Select the process in which you want to detect memory leak.

 12.jpg

Finally select 'Activate the rule now'.

13.jpg

Now let the application run and 'Debugdiag' tool will run at the backend monitoring memory issues.

14.jpg
 
Once done click on start analysis and let the tool do the analysis.

 15.jpg
 
You should get a detail HTML report which shows how unmanaged memory was allocated. In our code we had allocated huge unmanaged memory using 'AllochGlobal' which is shown in the report below.

Type  Description 

Warning

mscorlib.ni.dll is responsible for 3.59 MBytes worth of outstanding allocations. The following are the top 2 memory consuming functions:

System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.AllocHGlobal(IntPtr): 3.59 MBytes worth of outstanding allocations.

Warning

ntdll.dll is responsible for 270.95 KBytes worth of outstanding allocations. The following are the top 2 memory consuming functions:

ntdll!RtlpDphNormalHeapAllocate+1d: 263.78 KBytes worth of outstanding allocations.
ntdll!RtlCreateHeap+5fc: 6.00 KBytes worth of outstanding allocations.

Managed memory leak of brushes are shown using 'GdiPlus.dll' in the below HTML report.

Type Description

  Warning

GdiPlus.dll is responsible for 399.54 KBytes worth of outstanding allocations.
The following are the top 2 memory consuming functions:

GdiPlus!GpMalloc+16: 399.54 KBytes worth of outstanding allocations.

Where is the memory leak?

Once you know what the source of a memory leak is, it's time to find out which logic is causing the memory leak. There is no automated tool to detect logic which caused memory leaks. You need to manually go in your code and take the pointers provided by 'debugdiag' to conclude in which places the issues are.

For instance from the report it's clear that 'AllocHGlobal' is causing the unmanaged leak while one of the objects of GDI is causing the managed leak. Using these details we need to go to them in the code to see where exactly the issue lies.

Source code

You can download the source code from the top of this article which can help you inject memory leak.

Thanks, Thanks and Thanks

It would be unfair on my part to say that the above article is completely my knowledge. Thanks for all the lovely people that have written articles so that one day someone like me can be benefit.

My other .NET best practices article

.NET best practice 1:- In this article we discuss about how we can find high memory consumption areas in .NET. You can read about the same at .NET best practice 1 
.NET best practice 2:- In this article we discuss how we can improve performance using finalize / dispose pattern. .NET best practice 2
.NET best practice 3:- How can we use performance counters to gather performance data from .NET applications .NET best practice 3
.NET best practice 4 :- How can we improve bandwidth performance using IIS compression .NET best practice 4.


Similar Articles