GitHub Copilot: Sharing Code for Progress, Privacy in Question


The objective is mainly "Don't blindly check the box – make an informed decision".

GitHub Copilot

The Sharing Sizzle

The benefits of sharing seem enticing. Your code contributes to a richer training dataset, leading to smarter suggestions for everyone, including yourself. Faster development, a more vibrant developer community – it all sounds like a no-brainer. Additionally, GitHub assures data anonymization, protecting your personal information (at least, that's their claim).

The Privacy Pendulum Swings

Anonymization isn't magic. Unique code structures, comments, and even variable names can leave digital trails leading back to you. Sharing commercially sensitive code could be disastrous. More importantly, the specter of bias looms large. Trained on potentially biased data, Copilot could perpetuate those biases in its suggestions, disadvantaging certain groups of developers.

Beyond the Checkbox

The issue goes deeper than just ticking a box. Transparency is key. Does GitHub clearly explain how your code is used and for what purposes? Can you easily opt out if you change your mind? Are there better alternatives that offer similar functionality without privacy concerns?

Taking Control of Your Code

As developers, we must be proactive. Conduct your own research. Understand the privacy implications. Don't blindly check the box – make an informed decision. Perhaps share only generic code, or opt-out entirely. Remember, your code is your intellectual property, and you have the right to control its destiny.


This blog is just the beginning of the conversation. Share your thoughts, concerns, and experiences! Together. 

Remember, this is just a suggestion. Feel free to add your personal insights, experiences, and technical details to make the blog even richer and more informative.

Similar Articles