Introduction
The defining feature of a stablecoin is in its name: stability. Unlike Bitcoin or Ethereum, stablecoins aim to hold a constant value, usually $1. But how do they achieve this stability in a volatile market?
Stablecoins use different peg mechanisms — fiat reserves, crypto collateral, algorithms, or physical assets — to keep their price steady. In this article, we’ll explore how these mechanisms work and their strengths and weaknesses.
Fiat-Backed Peg (USDT, USDC, TUSD)
How it works:
Each stablecoin is backed 1:1 by fiat reserves (cash or cash equivalents).
Users can redeem 1 USDC/USDT for $1 at any time.
This redemption mechanism enforces the peg.
Example:
Strengths:
✔ Simple and effective.
✔ Strong market confidence if audits are transparent.
Weaknesses:
✘ Centralized (issuer must be trusted).
✘ Reliant on traditional banking partners.
Crypto-Backed Peg (DAI, sUSD)
How it works:
Users deposit volatile crypto (e.g., ETH) into smart contracts.
Over-collateralization ensures stability (e.g., $1.50 ETH backs $1 DAI).
If collateral falls, liquidation keeps the peg intact.
Example:
To mint 100 DAI, a user might need $150 worth of ETH.
If ETH price drops, collateral is liquidated to protect the peg.
Strengths:
✔ Decentralized and transparent.
✔ Resilient if over-collateralized.
Weaknesses:
✘ Inefficient use of capital.
✘ Risk of liquidation in volatile markets.
Algorithmic Peg (AMPL, UST – failed)
How it works:
Smart contracts automatically expand or contract supply.
If price > $1 → mint new coins (increase supply).
If price < $1 → burn coins (reduce supply).
Example:
TerraUSD (UST) used a burn/mint mechanism with LUNA.
When confidence collapsed in 2022, the peg failed.
Strengths:
✔ No collateral needed.
✔ Scalable design if demand holds.
Weaknesses:
✘ Very fragile in crises.
✘ History of failures undermines trust.
Asset-Backed Peg (PAXG, XAUT)
How it works:
Each token represents a share of a real-world asset (e.g., 1 PAXG = 1 ounce of gold).
Custodians store the assets in vaults.
Peg follows market price of the asset, not fixed $1.
Example:
Strengths:
✔ Tangible backing increases trust.
✔ Diversification beyond fiat.
Weaknesses:
✘ Lower liquidity than fiat-backed coins.
✘ Reliance on custodians and audits.
Arbitrage: The Secret Behind Peg Stability
Across all models, arbitrage trading plays a crucial role:
This constant buying and selling enforces the peg in liquid markets.
Peg Maintenance Challenges
Banking risks: If issuers lose banking partners, redemptions can halt.
Collateral risks: Crypto-backed coins face liquidation risk during crashes.
Confidence risks: If users doubt reserves, even fiat-backed coins can de-peg.
Regulatory risks: Laws may restrict redemption mechanisms.
Summary
Stablecoins maintain their peg through four main mechanisms:
Fiat-backed – dollar reserves (USDT, USDC).
Crypto-backed – over-collateralized crypto (DAI).
Algorithmic – supply control via smart contracts (AMPL, UST).
Asset-backed – pegged to commodities like gold (PAXG).
While arbitrage and redemption mechanisms keep the peg intact, history shows that weak models (like algorithmic UST) can fail spectacularly. Trust, transparency, and liquidity are key to stability.
FAQ
Q1. How do stablecoins stay at $1?
Through redemption, collateral, or algorithms, plus arbitrage trading that restores price balance.
Q2. Why do stablecoins sometimes lose their peg?
Banking crises, collateral crashes, or loss of confidence can break stability.
Q3. Which peg mechanism is most reliable?
Fiat-backed with transparent audits (like USDC) is currently the most trusted.
Q4. Can asset-backed stablecoins be pegged to $1?
Not exactly — they follow asset prices (e.g., gold), so they fluctuate with markets.