modern DevOps and cloud-native development, Docker has become an essential tool for packaging and deploying applications. However, one of the most common challenges developers face is managing large Docker image sizes. Large images slow down build times, increase storage usage, consume more bandwidth, and impact deployment performance.
Multi-stage builds in Docker provide a powerful solution to this problem. They allow developers to create smaller, secure, and production-ready images by separating the build environment from the runtime environment.
This article explores multi-stage builds, why they matter, how they work, and best practices for using them in production environments.
The Problem with Traditional Docker Builds
In a traditional Docker build process, everything required to build and run the application is included in a single image. This often includes:
SDKs and compilers
Build tools
Temporary files
Debugging utilities
Source code
While these components are necessary during development and compilation, they are not required when running the application in production.
As a result, traditional Docker images become unnecessarily large, which leads to several problems:
Slower image downloads and deployments
Increased security risks due to extra tools
Higher storage and infrastructure costs
Reduced performance in CI/CD pipelines
This is where multi-stage builds provide a better approach.
What Are Multi-Stage Builds?
Multi-stage builds allow you to use multiple stages within a single Dockerfile. Each stage can use a different base image and serve a different purpose, such as building, testing, or running the application.
The key idea is simple:
Use one stage to build the application
Use another stage to run the application
Copy only the necessary files from the build stage to the final stage
This ensures the final image contains only what is required to run the application.
How Multi-Stage Builds Work
In a multi-stage Dockerfile, each stage starts with a FROM instruction. The first stage is typically called the build stage, and the last stage is the production stage.
The build stage includes:
SDK
Compiler
Source code
Build tools
The runtime stage includes only:
Runtime environment
Compiled application
All unnecessary files are left behind in earlier stages.
This significantly reduces the final image size.
Example: ASP.NET Core Application
Let’s understand this with a conceptual example.
Without Multi-Stage Build
If you use a full .NET SDK image to run your application, the image may include:
.NET SDK
Build tools
Source files
Runtime
This can result in an image size of over 700 MB.
With Multi-Stage Build
Using multi-stage builds:
Stage 1 (Build Stage):
Uses .NET SDK image
Compiles the application
Stage 2 (Runtime Stage):
Final image size may reduce to around 150–200 MB.
This is a significant improvement.
Benefits of Multi-Stage Builds
1. Smaller Image Size
The final image contains only the runtime and compiled application. This reduces storage requirements and improves deployment speed.
2. Improved Security
Removing SDKs, compilers, and unnecessary tools reduces the attack surface. Smaller images are more secure and easier to maintain.
3. Faster CI/CD Pipelines
Smaller images:
Build faster
Transfer faster
Deploy faster
This improves overall DevOps efficiency.
4. Better Performance
Containers start faster when image size is smaller. This is especially important in auto-scaling environments like Kubernetes.
5. Cleaner and More Maintainable Dockerfiles
Multi-stage builds separate responsibilities clearly:
Build stage
Test stage
Production stage
This improves readability and maintainability.
Multi-Stage Builds in DevOps Workflow
Multi-stage builds play a key role in modern DevOps pipelines.
Typical workflow:
Developer writes code
CI pipeline builds Docker image using multi-stage build
Only production files are included
Image is pushed to container registry
Image is deployed to cloud or Kubernetes
This ensures consistent and optimized deployments.
Real-World Use Cases
Multi-stage builds are commonly used in:
ASP.NET Core applications
Java applications
Node.js applications
Microservices architecture
Kubernetes deployments
Cloud-native applications
It is considered a standard best practice in production environments.
Best Practices for Multi-Stage Builds
Use Smaller Runtime Images
Always use lightweight runtime images such as runtime-only versions instead of full SDK versions.
Name Build Stages Clearly
Use meaningful stage names like build, publish, or runtime for better readability.
Copy Only Required Files
Avoid copying unnecessary files into the final image.
Combine with .dockerignore
Exclude unnecessary files like logs, git folders, and temporary files.
Keep Images Minimal
Smaller images improve security and performance.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Including unnecessary tools in final image
Copying entire source code instead of compiled output
Using SDK image for production
Ignoring image size optimization
Not using .dockerignore
Avoiding these mistakes ensures efficient Docker images.
When Should You Use Multi-Stage Builds?
Multi-stage builds should be used in almost all production scenarios, especially when:
It is now considered an industry standard.
Conclusion
Multi-stage builds are one of the most important features in Docker for creating efficient, secure, and production-ready container images. By separating the build environment from the runtime environment, developers can significantly reduce image size, improve security, and accelerate deployment processes.
In modern DevOps workflows, where speed, reliability, and efficiency are critical, multi-stage builds help teams deliver optimized applications faster and more consistently. Adopting this approach ensures better performance, reduced costs, and improved scalability, making it an essential practice for every Docker and DevOps engineer.