Smoke vs Sanity Testing — When to Use Which?

🔍 Introduction

In software testing, two terms often confuse beginners: Smoke Testing and Sanity Testing. Both are important types of software testing techniques used to ensure software quality. Although they sound similar, they serve different purposes in the Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC).

• Smoke Testing is a quick check to confirm that the critical features of an application are working after a new build.

• Sanity Testing is a focused check to confirm that specific functionality or bug fixes are working as expected.

In simple words, Smoke testing asks, “Is the build stable?” while Sanity testing asks, “Is the fix or feature working correctly?”

This article explains the differences between Smoke and Sanity testing, their objectives, and real-life examples of when to use each.

🚬 What is Smoke Testing?

Smoke Testing is also known as Build Verification Testing (BVT). It is a shallow and wide testing approach where testers verify whether the most critical functions of the application are working.

🔑 Key Points about Smoke Testing:

1. Purpose: To check if the build is stable enough for detailed testing.

2. Coverage: Covers all major modules of the application at a high level.

3. When Used: After receiving a new build from developers.

4. Execution: Usually manual, but can also be automated for CI/CD pipelines.

5. Time Taken: Very quick, often 1–2 hours depending on the project.

✅ Example of Smoke Testing:

Imagine a banking app is built and released. Testers check:

• Can the app be installed and launched?

• Can a user log in with valid credentials?

• Does the dashboard load?

• Can a user log out successfully?

If these basic checks fail, there is no point in doing detailed testing.

🧪 What is Sanity Testing?

Sanity Testing is a narrow and deep testing approach where testers verify that specific bug fixes or new features work correctly.

🔑 Key Points about Sanity Testing:

1. Purpose: To validate specific functionality after minor changes or bug fixes.

2. Coverage: Focused only on affected areas of the application.

3. When Used: After regression testing or when a defect is fixed.

4. Execution: Performed manually, as it requires logical checks.

5. Time Taken: Short, usually a few hours.

✅ Example of Sanity Testing:

Suppose in the same banking app, the login bug (wrong password issue) was fixed. Testers check:

• Enter invalid password → Proper error message appears.

• Enter valid password → Successful login.

• Other login-related scenarios still work fine.

Here, the tester is not checking the entire app, only the login module where the fix was applied.

⚖️ Smoke vs Sanity Testing: Key Differences

Aspect	Smoke Testing	Sanity Testing
Definition	High-level check of major functionalities	Focused check of specific functionality
Objective	To confirm the stability of the build	To confirm bug fixes or small changes work
Scope	Wide but shallow coverage	Narrow but deep coverage
When Performed	After a new build is released	After a minor change or bug fix
Time Required	Very short (1–2 hours)	Short (few hours)
Performed By	Testers, sometimes automated in pipelines	Testers, usually manual
Outcome	Decide if build is stable for further testing	Decide if specific functionality works fine

📌 Real-Life Example of Both

Consider an E-commerce Website:

• Smoke Testing Example:

  • Can users open the website?

  • Can users log in?

  • Can they search for products?

  • Can they add items to the cart?

• Sanity Testing Example:

  • A bug in the checkout page is fixed.

  • Tester checks if the checkout button works properly now.

  • Verifies if the payment redirection is working correctly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Which comes first: Smoke testing or Sanity testing?

• Smoke testing comes first because it checks whether the build is stable enough for further testing. Sanity testing happens later, usually after a bug fix or minor change.

2. Is smoke testing manual or automated?

• Smoke testing can be both manual and automated. In Agile or CI/CD environments, automation is common to speed up the process.

3. Is sanity testing part of regression testing?

• Yes, sanity testing is often considered a subset of regression testing. It focuses only on specific areas affected by changes.

4. Who performs smoke and sanity testing?

• Both are generally performed by the QA team, but smoke testing can also be automated and integrated into the development pipeline.

5. Why are smoke and sanity testing important?

• They save time and effort by ensuring:

  • Smoke testing → Don’t waste time testing unstable builds.

  • Sanity testing → Confirm bug fixes or features work correctly before moving forward.

🎯 Summary

• Smoke Testing = Quick, broad check → “Is the build stable?”

• Sanity Testing = Focused, detailed check → “Is the fix working correctly?”

• Both are essential to save time and effort in the software testing life cycle.

• Smoke testing is done first, and sanity testing is done after specific fixes.

👉 Smoke testing prevents wasting time on unstable builds, while sanity testing ensures specific changes work before moving forward.