Supabase is growing in popularity among startups and developers. It provides similar functionality to Firebase. Let's learn the difference between Firebase and Supabase and when to choose one over the other.
🔍 What is Supabase?
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) that helps developers build scalable applications quickly—without needing to manage infrastructure.
At its core, Supabase provides:
PostgreSQL database (fully managed, scalable, relational)
Authentication (email, social logins, magic links)
Storage (file uploads, image hosting, access control)
Edge Functions (serverless functions running close to the user)
Realtime APIs (live updates from database changes)
It’s often called the “open-source Firebase alternative” because it offers similar functionality but with the power and flexibility of Postgres.
🔥 What is Firebase?
Firebase, owned by Google, is one of the most popular backend-as-a-service platforms. It provides:
Firestore (NoSQL cloud database)
Firebase Authentication (Google, GitHub, Facebook logins, phone auth, etc.)
Cloud Storage (large file storage)
Cloud Functions (serverless backend code)
Analytics & Crashlytics (monitoring and performance insights)
Firebase is not open-source but deeply integrated with the Google Cloud ecosystem, making it ideal for fast prototyping and apps that scale on Google’s infrastructure.
⚔️ Supabase vs Firebase: Key Differences
Here’s a side-by-side comparison 👇
| Feature | Supabase | Firebase |
|---|
| Database | PostgreSQL (SQL, relational, ACID transactions) | Firestore (NoSQL, document-based, scalable) |
| Open Source | ✅ 100% open-source | ❌ Proprietary (Google-owned) |
| Data Structure | Tables, rows, relationships | Documents, collections (nested JSON) |
| Authentication | Email, social logins, magic links | Email, social logins, phone, multi-factor |
| Realtime | Database changes trigger realtime updates | Firestore has built-in realtime sync |
| Functions | Edge Functions (TypeScript, Deno runtime) | Cloud Functions (Node.js, Google Cloud runtime) |
| Storage | File storage with Postgres policies | Cloud Storage for Firebase |
| Pricing | Transparent, based on database/storage usage | Free tier generous but costs grow unpredictably |
| Community | Open-source community, GitHub contributions | Backed by Google with enterprise support |
🧑‍💻 When to Use Supabase
Supabase is a better fit if you need:
Relational data models (e.g., e-commerce, finance, social apps with many relations)
SQL querying (familiar to most developers)
Self-hosting or open-source flexibility
Full control of database migrations and schema
Example use cases:
🚀 When to Use Firebase
Firebase is ideal if you want:
Simple JSON-based data structure
Instant realtime sync across devices
Deep Google Cloud integrations (ML Kit, Analytics, Crashlytics)
Faster time-to-market for mobile apps
Example use cases:
đź’° Pricing Comparison
Supabase: Transparent pricing. You pay for Postgres database size, storage, and function execution. Great for predictable costs.
Firebase: Free tier is generous, but scaling (especially Firestore reads/writes) can become expensive and unpredictable for apps with high data access.
⚡ Final Thoughts: Supabase or Firebase?
Choose Supabase if you want SQL, relational data, open-source flexibility, and transparent pricing.
Choose Firebase if you want rapid mobile app development, real-time sync, and deep integration with Google’s ecosystem.
👉 In 2025, many startups adopt Supabase as a cost-effective, developer-friendly alternative, while enterprises continue using Firebase for Google Cloud alignment.
âś… Summary
Supabase = Open-source Firebase alternative powered by PostgreSQL.
Firebase = Google-backed BaaS built on NoSQL Firestore.
Your choice depends on data structure (SQL vs NoSQL), pricing, and ecosystem needs.