Introduction
Core Web Vitals are a set of important performance metrics defined by Google to measure real user experience on a website. These metrics directly impact SEO ranking, page experience, and overall website performance. If your website loads slowly, shifts content unexpectedly, or responds late to user actions, it can negatively affect your rankings on Google search.
Improving Core Web Vitals is not just about technical optimization—it directly improves user satisfaction, engagement, and conversion rates. In this article, we will understand Core Web Vitals in detail and explore practical ways to improve them with real-world examples.
What are Core Web Vitals?
Core Web Vitals focus on three key aspects of user experience:
Loading Performance (LCP – Largest Contentful Paint)
Interactivity (INP – Interaction to Next Paint)
Visual Stability (CLS – Cumulative Layout Shift)
These metrics are part of Google's ranking factors and are critical for SEO optimization.
1. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
LCP measures how quickly the largest visible content (like an image or heading) loads on the screen.
Ideal Value
Good: Less than 2.5 seconds
Needs Improvement: 2.5s – 4s
Poor: More than 4s
Real-World Example
On an e-commerce website, the main product image or banner is usually the LCP element.
Common Causes of Poor LCP
Slow server response time
Large image sizes
Render-blocking CSS and JavaScript
No caching
How to Improve LCP
1. Optimize Images
Use modern formats like WebP or AVIF
Compress images without losing quality
<img src="image.webp" alt="product" loading="lazy" />
2. Use CDN (Content Delivery Network)
Deliver content from servers closer to users
3. Reduce Server Response Time
Use faster hosting
Enable caching
4. Remove Render-Blocking Resources
Defer non-critical JavaScript
<script src="script.js" defer></script>
5. Preload Important Resources
<link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero.webp">
Advantages of Optimizing LCP
Faster page load
Better SEO ranking
Improved user engagement
Disadvantages
Requires backend and frontend optimization
2. Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
INP measures how quickly a page responds when a user interacts (click, tap, input).
Ideal Value
Good: Less than 200 ms
Needs Improvement: 200–500 ms
Poor: More than 500 ms
Real-World Example
Clicking "Add to Cart"
Submitting a form
Common Causes of Poor INP
Heavy JavaScript execution
Long main-thread blocking
Unoptimized event handlers
How to Improve INP
1. Reduce JavaScript Execution
Remove unused code
Split large bundles
2. Use Code Splitting
import dynamic from 'next/dynamic';
const Component = dynamic(() => import('./HeavyComponent'));
3. Optimize Event Handlers
Avoid heavy calculations inside click events
4. Use Web Workers
Move heavy tasks off the main thread
Advantages
Faster user interaction
Better user experience
Disadvantages
Requires performance tuning and profiling

Join the conversation! Your thoughts help the community grow.