C#  

Implementing Event-Driven Architectures with Kafka, RabbitMQ, or Azure Service Bus (Comparisons, Pros, and Cons)

Event-driven architecture (EDA) is a powerful approach where services communicate through events rather than direct calls, enabling scalability, decoupling, and resilience. In C# and .NET systems, three popular message brokers used to implement EDA are Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and Azure Service Bus.

This document compares these technologies, explaining their use cases, pros and cons, and offering guidance on when to choose each for your system.

Overview of Each Technology
 

Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka is a distributed streaming platform designed for high-throughput event streams and real-time data pipelines. It stores events durably in ordered logs and allows multiple consumers to process the same stream independently.

  • Best for: Large-scale event streams, real-time analytics, event sourcing, and stream processing.
  • Key features: Partitioned topics, horizontal scalability, strong ordering guarantees, consumer groups, and high throughput.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is a traditional message broker that implements Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP). It supports a variety of messaging patterns, including publish/subscribe, work queues, and request/reply.

  • Best for: Reliable message delivery, task queues, routing patterns, moderate throughput systems.
  • Key features: Flexible routing (exchanges), support for multiple protocols, pluggable architecture, easy setup.

Azure Service Bus

Azure Service Bus is a fully managed cloud messaging service provided by Microsoft, designed for enterprise-level applications. It supports queues, topics, and subscriptions, offering rich integration with Azure services.

  • Best for: Cloud-native applications, hybrid systems, enterprise workflows, systems needing advanced features like sessions and dead-lettering.
  • Key features: Managed service, automatic scaling, dead-letter queues, duplicate detection, geo-disaster recovery.

Comparisons: Kafka vs. RabbitMQ vs. Azure Service Bus
 

Feature Apache Kafka RabbitMQ Azure Service Bus
Delivery Guarantee At least once, exactly once (with Kafka Streams) At least once, exactly once (with plugins) At least once, exactly once (with sessions)
Ordering Per partition Per queue Per session or partition
Throughput Very high (millions/sec) Medium to high Medium to high
Persistence Durable log (configurable retention) Persistent or transient queues Persistent queues
Management Self-managed, requires cluster ops Easier to set up, requires broker mgmt Fully managed by Azure
Protocols Kafka protocol, REST, Kafka Streams AMQP, MQTT, STOMP, HTTP AMQP, HTTP, REST
Ecosystem/Integrations Wide (Kafka Connect, ksqlDB, Streams) Good (plugins, adapters) Tight Azure ecosystem integration
Cloud Offering Confluent Cloud, AWS MSK, Azure Event Hubs Cloud AMQP brokers, CloudAMQP Native Azure service
Best for Event streams, analytics, big data pipelines Work queues, routing, lightweight pub/sub Enterprise workflows, cloud-to-cloud, hybrid apps


Pros and Cons
 

Apache Kafka

Pros

  • Massive scalability and high throughput.
  • Strong ordering and replay capabilities.
  • Broad ecosystem and integrations (Kafka Streams, Connect, ksqlDB).

Cons

  • Complex to manage and operate.
  • Requires deep knowledge of partitions, brokers, and replication.
  • Higher resource consumption.

RabbitMQ

Pros

  • Easy to set up and operate.
  • Supports many protocols and plugins.
  • Flexible routing patterns (direct, topic, fanout, headers).

Cons

  • Lower throughput compared to Kafka.
  • Less suited for event replay or long-term storage.
  • Requires careful tuning for high-scale setups.

Azure Service Bus

Pros

  • Fully managed; no need to maintain infrastructure.
  • Enterprise-grade features (sessions, dead-letter queues, duplicate detection).
  • Tight integration with the Azure ecosystem.

Cons

  • Vendor lock-in (Azure-only).
  • Higher latency compared to Kafka for streaming workloads.
  • Usage costs can scale with message volume.

When to Choose Which?

  • Choose Kafka if you need massive-scale streaming, real-time analytics, event sourcing, or complex event processing.
  • Choose RabbitMQ if you need flexible messaging patterns, lightweight queues, or simple brokered communication.
  • Choose Azure Service Bus if you are building cloud-native or hybrid applications on Azure and need enterprise features like dead-lettering, retries, and managed reliability.

Each message broker has its strengths and trade-offs. The right choice depends on your architecture, scale, operational needs, and cloud strategy. By understanding these differences, you can confidently design event-driven architectures in C# that are scalable, resilient, and fit-for-purpose.

Sample C# Producer and Consumer Code for Kafka, RabbitMQ, and Azure Service Bus

This section provides basic C# producer and consumer code examples for Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and Azure Service Bus to help you get started quickly.

Apache Kafka

Kafka Producer (C#)

using Confluent.Kafka;

var config = new ProducerConfig { BootstrapServers = "localhost:9092" };

using var producer = new ProducerBuilder<Null, string>(config).Build();
await producer.ProduceAsync("my-topic", new Message<Null, string> { Value = "Hello Kafka" });

Kafka Consumer (C#)

using Confluent.Kafka;
var config = new ConsumerConfig
{
    BootstrapServers = "localhost:9092",
    GroupId = "my-group",
    AutoOffsetReset = AutoOffsetReset.Earliest
};
using var consumer = new ConsumerBuilder<Ignore, string>(config).Build();
consumer.Subscribe("my-topic");
while (true)
{
    var consumeResult = consumer.Consume();
    Console.WriteLine($"Received: {consumeResult.Message.Value}");
}

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ Producer (C#)

using RabbitMQ.Client;
using System.Text;

var factory = new ConnectionFactory() { HostName = "localhost" };

using var connection = factory.CreateConnection();
using var channel = connection.CreateModel();

channel.QueueDeclare(
    queue: "hello", 
    durable: false, 
    exclusive: false, 
    autoDelete: false
);

var body = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("Hello RabbitMQ");

channel.BasicPublish(
    exchange: "", 
    routingKey: "hello", 
    basicProperties: null, 
    body: body
);

RabbitMQ Consumer (C#)

using RabbitMQ.Client;
using RabbitMQ.Client.Events;
using System.Text;

var factory = new ConnectionFactory() { HostName = "localhost" };

using var connection = factory.CreateConnection();
using var channel = connection.CreateModel();

channel.QueueDeclare(
    queue: "hello", 
    durable: false, 
    exclusive: false, 
    autoDelete: false
);

var consumer = new EventingBasicConsumer(channel);
consumer.Received += (model, ea) =>
{
    var body = ea.Body.ToArray();
    var message = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(body);
    Console.WriteLine($"Received: {message}");
};

channel.BasicConsume(
    queue: "hello", 
    autoAck: true, 
    consumer: consumer
);

Azure Service Bus

Service Bus Producer (C#)

using Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus;

string connectionString = "<your-service-bus-connection-string>";
string queueName = "myqueue";

await using var client = new ServiceBusClient(connectionString);
ServiceBusSender sender = client.CreateSender(queueName);

ServiceBusMessage message = new ServiceBusMessage("Hello Azure Service Bus");
await sender.SendMessageAsync(message);

Service Bus Consumer (C#)

using Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus;

string connectionString = "<your-service-bus-connection-string>";
string queueName = "myqueue";
await using var client = new ServiceBusClient(connectionString);
ServiceBusProcessor processor = client.CreateProcessor(queueName);
processor.ProcessMessageAsync += async args =>
{
    string body = args.Message.Body.ToString();
    Console.WriteLine($"Received: {body}");
    await args.CompleteMessageAsync(args.Message);
};
processor.ProcessErrorAsync += args =>
{
    Console.WriteLine(args.Exception.ToString());
    return Task.CompletedTask;
};
await processor.StartProcessingAsync();
Console.ReadKey();
await processor.StopProcessingAsync();

Membership not found