Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
SAST analyzes source code or binaries for security vulnerabilities without executing the program. It is typically performed early in the development lifecycle and helps identify issues like SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and insecure coding practices.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
DAST tests a running application to identify vulnerabilities in real-time. It simulates external attacks and is effective in detecting runtime issues such as authentication flaws, server misconfigurations, and insecure APIs.
Benefits of Automation
Early detection of vulnerabilities
Continuous security validation
Reduced manual effort and human error
Faster feedback loops for developers
Improved compliance and audit readiness
Tools Used
Common tools for SAST include:
SonarQube
Checkmarx
Fortify
CodeQL
Common tools for DAST include: OWASP ZAP
Burp Suite
AppSpider
Acunetix
Integration Strategies in CI/CD Pipelines
Integrating SAST and DAST into CI/CD pipelines involves:
Running SAST tools during the build phase to analyze code before deployment
Triggering DAST scans post-deployment in staging environments
Using plugins or CLI tools to automate scans and fail builds on critical vulnerabilities
Storing scan results in centralized dashboards for visibility and tracking
Sample Configurations
SAST with SonarQube in Jenkins
pipeline {
stages {
stage('Code Analysis') {
steps {
script {
sh 'sonar-scanner -Dsonar.projectKey=myapp -Dsonar.sources=src -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000'
}
}
}
}
}
DAST with OWASP ZAP in GitHub Actions
jobs:
zap_scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: ZAP Baseline Scan
uses: zaproxy/[email protected]
with:
target: 'http://localhost:8080'
fail_action: true
Best Practices
Shift security left by integrating early in the SDLC
Use both SAST and DAST for comprehensive coverage
Automate scans and enforce quality gates
Regularly update tools and rulesets
Educate developers on secure coding practices