Managing Git history effectively is crucial for maintaining clean, understandable, and collaborative codebases. Whether you're working solo or in a team, knowing when to use merge, rebase, or squash can significantly impact your development workflow and Git commit clarity.
In this article, we’ll learn how these three Git operations work, when to use them, and how they affect your project history. Additionally, we’ll wrap it up with a handy interview cheat sheet to help you ace Git-related technical interviews.
What You’ll Learn in this Article
-
The core concept of Git commit history and why it matters
-
When and why to use each method in real-world projects
-
How to perform each operation step-by-step with examples
-
The differences between merge, rebase, and squash
-
Common interview questions and answers
What is Git History?
Git history is the record of all commits made in a repository. Each commit acts like a snapshot of your code at a specific point in time, showing what changed, who changed it, and when. Git uses a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to track the lineage of these commits, enabling powerful version control, branching, and collaboration features.
Why Clean Commit History Matters
A clean and meaningful commit history isn’t just about keeping things neat — it directly impacts how effectively you and your team can work. Here's why it’s crucial:
-
Easier debugging: You can quickly identify when and why a bug was introduced.
-
Better understanding: New team members or reviewers can follow the progression of a feature or fix.
-
implified merges: Clean history reduces the chances of messy conflicts during integration.
-
Traceability: Each feature, fix, or change is clearly documented with purpose.
What Happens When You Commit?
When you run a command
git commit -m "Add login feature"
Git performs the following:
-
Takes a snapshot of the staged files in your working directory.
-
Stores the snapshot in Git’s internal database.
-
Creates a commit object that points to:
-
The snapshot of your changes
-
Metadata (author, timestamp, commit message)
-
A reference to the previous commit (the "parent")
This commit becomes part of your project’s version history and is linked to earlier commits, forming a chain of changes over time.
Overview: Merge vs Rebase vs Squash
In Git, there are multiple ways to integrate changes from one branch to another. Each method affects your commit history differently:
-
Merge creates a new commit that brings two histories together without altering the original commits.
-
Rebase replays your commits on top of another base branch, resulting in a linear history.
-
Squash combines multiple commits into one, helping to keep the repository history clean and focused.
Git Merge: Combining Branches the Traditional Way
What is Git Merge?
git merge is a non-destructive operation that allows you to combine the contents of one branch into another without rewriting commit history.
-
It creates a new commit (called a merge commit) that ties together the histories of both branches.
-
This means all the original commits from both branches are preserved as-is.
-
It’s the default and safest way to integrate changes when working in collaborative environments.
Git Merge Workflow (Step-by-Step)
Let’s say you’re working on a new feature in a separate branch called feature/login, and your main branch is main.
Start from main
git checkout main
Update main (optional but recommended)
git pull origin main
Merge the feature branch in main
git merge feature/login
Push to remote repository
git push origin main
When to Use Git Merge
Use git merge when:
-
You're ready to integrate a feature branch into main, develop, or any shared branch.
-
You want to preserve all commit history (good for audits, reviews, or collaboration).
-
You're working in a team environment where other developers might be relying on the commit structure.
Visualizing Merge in Git Log
Use this command to see a tree-like structure:
git log --oneline --graph --all
![Git Merge]()
Git Rebase: Rewriting History for Clarity
What is Git Rebase?
git rebase is a way to move or replay your commits on top of another base branch, creating a clean, linear commit history.
-
Unlike merge, rebase rewrites commit history by creating new commits.
-
It avoids merge commits, which can make history easier to read.
-
Rebase is especially useful when you want to clean up local commits before merging or sharing code.
Git Rebase Workflow (Step-by-Step)
Let’s say you’ve been working on a branch called feature/login and want to integrate it into main — but with a linear history, no merge commit.
Workflow:
-
Check out your feature branch
git checkout feature/login
-
Rebase onto latest main
git rebase main
This tells Git:
“Take all commits from feature/login and replay them on top of the latest main.
-
Resolve any conflicts (if they appear)
Git will pause and ask you to resolve conflicts. After fixing them:
git add . git rebase --continue
-
(Optional but important) Force push if the branch was already pushed earlier
git push --force
When to Use Git Rebase
Use rebase when:
-
You want to create a clean, linear history.
-
You’re working on a local feature branch.
-
You want to avoid unnecessary merge commits.
-
You’re cleaning up before creating a Pull Request (PR).
Git Squash: One Commit to Rule Them All
What is Git Squash?
git squash is a way to combine multiple commits into one. It’s typically used when cleaning up your commit history before merging a feature branch — turning messy "WIP", fix, or minor commits into a single, meaningful commit.
Squashing is commonly done during an interactive rebase or with a --squash merge.
Git Squash Workflow (Step-by-Step)
Method 1: Interactive Rebase
-
Check out your feature branch
git checkout feature/login
-
Start interactive rebase for last 3 commits (for example)
git rebase -i HEAD~3
-
Change pick to squash (or s) for commits you want to combine
pick 1a2b3c Add login form squash 4d5e6f Fix login validation squash 7g8h9i Update button style
-
Edit commit message if prompted, then save and close
-
Force push the rewritten history (if pushed before)
git push --force
Method 2: Squash Merge
If you don’t want to squash locally, you can squash during merge:
git checkout main git merge --squash feature/login git commit -m "Add login functionality"
This will apply all changes from the feature branch as one squashed commit on main, but without preserving individual commits.
When to Use Git Squash
Use squash when:
-
You're cleaning up messy or excessive commits before merging a feature
-
You want to group related changes into a single logical commit
-
You’re preparing for a Pull Request and want to simplify history
The Differences Between Merge, Rebase, and Squash
Although merge, rebase, and squash are all used to combine changes from one branch into another, they do so in very different ways — and choosing the right one depends on your workflow, collaboration model, and codebase structure.
| Feature |
Merge |
Rebase |
Squash |
| Preserves full history |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Creates merge commit |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Rewrites history |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
| Clean linear history |
Not always |
Yes |
Yes |
| Best for teams |
Yes |
Only local |
Only before merge |
| Requires force push |
No |
Sometimes |
Sometimes |
Which one should you use in which scenario?
-
Use Merge to combine long-lived branches and maintain traceability
-
Use Rebase for local development or when syncing with the latest main branch
-
Use Squash before merging to keep main/develop clean and focused
Git Merge vs Rebase vs Squash – Interview Q&A
1. What is Git Merge? When should you use it?
Answer:
Git Merge is a non-destructive way to combine two branches. It creates a new merge commit that retains the full history of both branches.
Use Merge When:
-
You want to preserve the original commit history.
-
Collaborating in teams where it's important to see the branch structure.
-
Merging long-running feature or release branches into the main or develop branch.
2. What is Git Rebase? How is it different from merge?
Answer:
Git Rebase rewrites the commit history by moving the feature branch commits onto the latest commit of the base branch. It creates a linear history without merge commits.
Difference from Merge:
-
Rebase makes history clean and linear.
-
Merge preserves history but can result in a more cluttered commit tree.
-
Rebase rewrites history, merge does not.
3. What is Git Squash and why is it used?
Answer:
Git Squash combines multiple commits into a single commit. It’s commonly used before merging a feature branch to make the commit history cleaner and more meaningful.
Use Squash When:
-
You want to reduce clutter from frequent or irrelevant commits.
-
You're preparing code for review or release.
-
You want to present a single unit of work in history.
4. What’s the risk of using Rebase on a shared/public branch?
Answer:
Rebasing a shared branch can cause conflicts and confusion because it rewrites history. Others working on the same branch may encounter problems when their local history diverges from the rewritten one.
Avoid using rebase on branches that have already been pushed and are used by others.
5. What is the difference between Git Merge, Rebase, and Squash?
| Feature |
Merge |
Rebase |
Squash |
| Preserves full history |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Creates merge commit |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Rewrites history |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
| Clean linear history |
Not always |
Yes |
Yes |
| Best for teams |
Yes |
Only local |
Only before merge |
| Requires force push |
No |
Sometimes |
Sometimes |
6. Which strategy should you use in which scenario?
-
Use Merge: When collaborating and history is important.
-
Use Rebase: When you want a clean history and are working alone or on a feature branch.
-
Use Squash: When you want to combine multiple related commits into one before merging a feature.
7. What command do you use to squash commits?
git rebase -i HEAD~N
Where N is the number of commits you want to squash. You then change all but the first pick to squash or s.
8. How do you resolve conflicts during a rebase or merge?
-
Use git status to see conflicting files.
-
Edit the files to resolve conflicts manually.
-
Run git add <file> after fixing.
-
Continue with git rebase --continue or git commit.
9. What is a merge commit?
Answer:
A merge commit is an automatic commit created when merging two branches. It contains two or more parent commits, showing the union of histories.
10. How can Git history affect your code review process?
Answer:
A clean, readable Git history makes it easier for reviewers to understand the intention of each change. Merge clutter or unclear commit messages can slow down reviews and introduce confusion.
Conclusion
Mastering these Git strategies is essential for building clean, collaborative, and professional development workflows. By applying them wisely, you can improve project clarity, enhance team collaboration, and maintain a meaningful commit history that tells the real story of your code.
Each strategy — merge, rebase, and squash — serves a unique purpose:
-
Merge is ideal when you want to preserve full commit history and show how branches evolved over time.
-
Rebase is best when you want to clean up your commit timeline, making it linear and easier to follow.
-
Squash helps you simplify multiple commits into one clear, meaningful change — especially before merging a feature branch.
The key is not to blindly choose one method over the other but to understand the context and apply the right tool at the right time.
Thank you for taking the time to read this post. I hope it has provided you with a clear understanding of how Git Merge, Rebase, and Squash work — and how each of them plays a key role in managing Git history effectively.
Keep practicing, keep collaborating, and keep pushing cleaner commits — one branch at a time.
Happy coding!!!