In this article I will explain the Difference between ASP.NET web service and
WCF services like ASP.NET web services. I will also discusses how we use the
both technologies for developing the web services.
Web Service in ASP.net:
A Web Service is programmable application logic accessible via standard Web
protocols. One of these Web protocols is the Simple Object Access Protocol
(SOAP). SOAP is a W3C submitted note (as of May 2000) that uses standards based
technologies (XML for data description and HTTP for transport) to encode and
transmit application data.
Consumers of a Web Service do not need to know anything about the platform,
object model, or programming language used to implement the service; they only
need to understand how to send and receive SOAP messages (HTTP and XML).
WCF Service:
Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) is a framework for building
service-oriented applications. Using WCF, you can send data as asynchronous
messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of
a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in
an application. An endpoint can be a client of a service that requests data from
a service endpoint. The messages can be as simple as a single character or word
sent as XML, or as complex as a stream of binary data.
In what scenarios WCF must be used:
- A secure service to process business transactions.
- A service that supplies current data to others, such as a traffic report or other monitoring service.
- A chat service that allows two people to communicate or exchange data in real time.
- A dashboard application that polls one or more services for data and presents it in a logical presentation.
- Exposing a workflow implemented using Windows Workflow Foundation as a WCF service.
- A Silverlight application to poll a service for the latest data feeds.
Features of WCF:
- Service Orientation
- Interoperability
- Multiple Message Patterns
- Service Metadata
- Data Contracts
- Security
- Multiple Transports and Encodings
- Reliable and Queued Messages
- Durable Messages
- Transactions
- AJAX and REST Support
- Extensibility
Difference between Web Service in ASP.net &
WCF Service:
WCF is a replacement for all earlier web service technologies from Microsoft. It
also does a lot more than what is traditionally considered as "web services".
WCF "web services" are part of a much broader spectrum of remote communication
enabled through WCF. You will get a much higher degree of flexibility and
portability doing things in WCF than through traditional ASMX because WCF is
designed, from the ground up, to summarize all of the different distributed
programming infrastructures offered by MS. An endpoint in WCF can be
communicated with just as easily over SOAP/XML as it can over TCP/binary and to
change this medium is simply a configuration file mod. In theory this reduces
the amount of new code needed when porting or changing business needs, targets,
etc.
ASMX is older than WCF, and anything ASMX can do so can WCF (and more).
Basically you can see WCF as trying to logically group together all the
different ways of getting two apps to communicate in the world of MS; ASMX
was just one of these many ways and so is now grouped under the WCF umbrella of
capabilities.
Web Services can be accessed only over HTTP & it works in stateless environment,
where WCF is flexible because its services can be hosted in different types of
applications. Common scenarios for hosting WCF services are IIS ,WAS
,Self-hosting ,Managed Windows Service.
Major Difference is That Web Services Use XmlSerializer But WCF Uses
DataContractSerializer which is better in Performance as Compared to
XmlSerializer.
Key issues with XmlSerializer to serialize .NET types to XML
- Only Public fields or Properties of .NET types can be translated into XML.
- Only the classes which implement IEnumerable interface.
- Classes that implement the IDictionary interface, such as Hash table can not be serialized.
Important difference between DataContractSerializer and XMLSerializer.
- A practical benefit of the design of the DataContractSerializer is better performance over Xmlserializer.
- XML Serialization does not indicate the which fields or properties of the type are serialized into XML where as DataCotratSerializer Explicitly shows the which fields or properties are serialized into XML.
- The DataContractSerializer can translate
the HashTable into XML.

The development of web service with ASP.NET
relies on defining data and relies on the XmlSerializer to transform data to or
from a service.
Key issues with XmlSerializer to serialize .NET types to XML

Mohamed ShehabPosted Mar 7, 2011, 8:23 PM
hi yatin, i would like to ask about references for WCF, and do u advice to begin start reading WCF instead of wasting time with web services? regards